-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Jerry Adams on Compromising our Worldview Jerry Adams on Buying Books Archives
Categories
Meta
The Anointed King in Exile: David’s Story and the Already/Not-Yet Kingdom of Christ
From a Reformed Baptist (1689) and amillennial perspective, the kingdom of God is not a future political program waiting to be inaugurated on earth. It is the present reign of the risen Christ, who already sits at the Father’s right hand, exercises genuine authority, and has transferred believers into his kingdom (Col 1:13–14). Yet this reign awaits its public, universal consummation when every enemy is finally put under his feet and death itself is abolished (1 Cor 15:25–27; Heb 2:8–9). One of the richest Old Testament patterns that illuminates this structure is the story of David between his anointing and his full enthronement.
The central correspondence is not that Saul represents Satan in every detail. It is that David is the divinely appointed king before his reign is publicly and universally established. Between anointing and enthronement he experiences opposition, suffering, exile, and apparent weakness—yet God’s kingdom purpose is already certain. This narrative pattern supplies a fruitful typological avenue for understanding the Messiah’s kingdom.
David Is King by Divine Appointment
The Lord tells Samuel that he has rejected Saul and has provided a king from among Jesse’s sons. David is anointed, and “the Spirit of the Lord came upon David from that day forward” (1 Sam 16:1, 12–13). The text carefully distinguishes between Saul’s continuing public position and David’s new divine status. Mark Boda notes that David’s initial anointing is followed by a prolonged interval before his public confirmation. The delay contrasts with Saul’s rapid rise and demonstrates that David’s kingship rests on God’s choice rather than immediate political possession (After God’s Own Heart, 32–33).
This gives us a crucial “already.” David is not merely a future king. He is already the Lord’s chosen and anointed king, already empowered by the Spirit, and already acting in ways that reveal the character of his coming reign. In Reformed Baptist covenant theology, this anticipates the way Christ is publicly declared to be the Son of God in power by his resurrection (Rom 1:4) and is installed as Lord and Christ at the Father’s right hand (Acts 2:32–36). The New Covenant does not begin with a mere promise of a future king; it begins with a reigning King who has already received the Spirit without measure and poured him out on his people.
The Old Ruler Remains in Power
Saul continues to occupy the throne, command the army, and exercise political authority. Yet his own words reveal that David’s rise threatens the existing order: “What more can he have but the kingdom?” (1 Sam 18:6–8). The tension is therefore not between a king and a private individual. It is between the rejected ruler and the Lord’s chosen ruler. David possesses the promise, but Saul still possesses the throne.
This is a useful parallel to the New Testament’s presentation of Christ. Jesus announces that the kingdom has arrived in his ministry—particularly through the defeat of demonic power—yet the final defeat of every enemy remains future (Matt 12:28–29). Paul can therefore say both that Christ “must reign” and that death is still the last enemy to be destroyed (1 Cor 15:25–27). From an amillennial standpoint, the “old order” of sin, death, and the present evil age continues under divine permission while the true King already reigns from heaven. The 1689 Confession’s emphasis on the mediatorial reign of Christ (chap. 8) and the present spiritual nature of the church (chap. 26) coheres with this: the kingdom is real and advancing, even while its visible, universal manifestation is still future.
David’s Suffering Does Not Disprove His Kingship
Jonathan finds David in the wilderness and strengthens him by affirming, “You shall be king over Israel,” even though David is at that moment being hunted by Saul (1 Sam 23:14–18). Peter Leithart interprets this period as David’s humiliation before exaltation: David is already the anointed crown prince, but he undergoes years of danger, wandering, persecution, and outlawry before ascending the throne (A House for My Name, 141–142, 144).
This guards against a common mistake: treating present suffering or apparent weakness as evidence that the kingdom is absent. In the Davidic pattern, suffering occurs precisely because the kingdom has been divinely granted but has not yet reached its public fullness. For the church under the New Covenant, this means that the opposition, persecution, and seeming weakness of the people of God do not call Christ’s present kingship into question. Rather, they belong to the pattern of the King who first suffered and then entered into his glory (Luke 24:26; Heb 2:10). Amillennial eschatology refuses both the triumphalism that expects the church’s present cultural dominance and the despair that concludes the kingdom has failed because the world remains hostile.
David Refuses to Seize the Kingdom
The most important ethical and theological feature of the narrative is David’s refusal to establish his reign by murdering Saul. In the cave, David has the opportunity to kill Saul, but he refuses to strike “the LORD’s anointed.” He leaves judgment and enthronement in the Lord’s hands. Saul himself eventually recognizes the implication: David will certainly become king, and the kingdom will be established in his hand (1 Sam 24:4–7, 16–22). The same pattern occurs again in 1 Samuel 26. David rejects Abishai’s claim that God has given Saul into his hand. God’s providential delivery of Saul does not authorize David to seize the throne. David expects God to act in God’s own time.
Leithart draws the connection directly: David does not seize the kingdom by force but entrusts himself to God, who will raise him in due time, anticipating the pattern of Jesus. The parallel should not be pressed into an exact identification of Saul with Satan. A better correspondence is simply this:
Saul is the rejected ruler who still exercises temporary authority.
David is the chosen king who suffers before public enthronement.
David refuses to take the kingdom through sinful violence.
God himself removes the old ruler and establishes the new king.
Christ likewise did not seize the kingdom by political intrigue or military force. He entrusted himself to the Father, who raised him and exalted him in due time (Phil 2:6–11; 1 Pet 2:23). From a 1689 Baptist perspective, this reinforces that the church’s advance is not through grasping after earthly power by ungodly means, but through the proclamation of the gospel, the administration of the ordinances, and the patient endurance of the saints under the already-reigning Christ (cf. 1689 Confession, chaps. 24, 26).
The Stages of David’s Enthronement
David’s public reign unfolds in stages rather than all at once. After Saul’s death, Judah anoints David king over Judah. Later, all Israel comes to Hebron and anoints him king over the whole nation (2 Sam 5:1–5). That staged development supports an amillennial distinction between:
David’s private anointing: divine appointment and identity.
David’s effective but partial rule: faithful activity while Saul remains in power.
David’s rule over Judah: a real but limited public reign.
David’s rule over all Israel: broader public recognition and consummation of the promise.
The analogy to Christ should be made at the level of theological pattern, not chronology. Acts 2 presents Jesus as raised, exalted to the Father’s right hand, and publicly constituted as Lord and Christ. Yet Hebrews says that, although everything has been subjected to him in principle, “at present we do not yet see everything in subjection to him” (Heb 2:8–9). That is almost a textual definition of the already/not-yet tension: Christ reigns now, but the visible and universal manifestation of that reign awaits the consummation.
Christ the Greater David
The David story must not be used to suggest that Christ’s present reign is merely potential, symbolic, or postponed. David’s anointing already changed his status, and the Spirit’s presence already marked him as the coming king. Likewise, Christ is already exalted and reigns now; believers have already been transferred into his kingdom (Col 1:13–14). The “not yet” concerns not the uncertainty of Christ’s kingship but the incompleteness of its public manifestation. The Davidic pattern therefore fits an amillennial structure well: the King is enthroned, the kingdom is active, the old order is being judged, opposition remains, and the final abolition of death awaits Christ’s return.
In the 1689 Baptist tradition, this coheres with a robust doctrine of the New Covenant: Christ is the Mediator who has already inaugurated the better covenant by his blood (Heb 8–10), and the church is the present expression of his kingdom people, gathered under his Word and ordinances while we wait for the resurrection and the new creation. The story of David between anointing and enthronement therefore does more than illustrate a point. It trains the church to live faithfully under an already-reigning King whose final public glory is certain, even while we still sojourn in the wilderness.
The pattern is clear: anointing, opposition, wilderness suffering, refusal to seize power, staged enthronement—and then the New Testament’s presentation of Christ as the greater David whose reign is already present but not yet consummated. In that tension the church is called to hope, endurance, and faithful witness.
The central correspondence is not that Saul represents Satan in every detail. It is that David is the divinely appointed king before his reign is publicly and universally established. Between anointing and enthronement he experiences opposition, suffering, exile, and apparent weakness—yet God’s kingdom purpose is already certain. This narrative pattern supplies a fruitful typological avenue for understanding the Messiah’s kingdom.
David Is King by Divine Appointment
The Lord tells Samuel that he has rejected Saul and has provided a king from among Jesse’s sons. David is anointed, and “the Spirit of the Lord came upon David from that day forward” (1 Sam 16:1, 12–13). The text carefully distinguishes between Saul’s continuing public position and David’s new divine status. Mark Boda notes that David’s initial anointing is followed by a prolonged interval before his public confirmation. The delay contrasts with Saul’s rapid rise and demonstrates that David’s kingship rests on God’s choice rather than immediate political possession (After God’s Own Heart, 32–33).
This gives us a crucial “already.” David is not merely a future king. He is already the Lord’s chosen and anointed king, already empowered by the Spirit, and already acting in ways that reveal the character of his coming reign. In Reformed Baptist covenant theology, this anticipates the way Christ is publicly declared to be the Son of God in power by his resurrection (Rom 1:4) and is installed as Lord and Christ at the Father’s right hand (Acts 2:32–36). The New Covenant does not begin with a mere promise of a future king; it begins with a reigning King who has already received the Spirit without measure and poured him out on his people.
The Old Ruler Remains in Power
Saul continues to occupy the throne, command the army, and exercise political authority. Yet his own words reveal that David’s rise threatens the existing order: “What more can he have but the kingdom?” (1 Sam 18:6–8). The tension is therefore not between a king and a private individual. It is between the rejected ruler and the Lord’s chosen ruler. David possesses the promise, but Saul still possesses the throne.
This is a useful parallel to the New Testament’s presentation of Christ. Jesus announces that the kingdom has arrived in his ministry—particularly through the defeat of demonic power—yet the final defeat of every enemy remains future (Matt 12:28–29). Paul can therefore say both that Christ “must reign” and that death is still the last enemy to be destroyed (1 Cor 15:25–27). From an amillennial standpoint, the “old order” of sin, death, and the present evil age continues under divine permission while the true King already reigns from heaven. The 1689 Confession’s emphasis on the mediatorial reign of Christ (chap. 8) and the present spiritual nature of the church (chap. 26) coheres with this: the kingdom is real and advancing, even while its visible, universal manifestation is still future.
David’s Suffering Does Not Disprove His Kingship
Jonathan finds David in the wilderness and strengthens him by affirming, “You shall be king over Israel,” even though David is at that moment being hunted by Saul (1 Sam 23:14–18). Peter Leithart interprets this period as David’s humiliation before exaltation: David is already the anointed crown prince, but he undergoes years of danger, wandering, persecution, and outlawry before ascending the throne (A House for My Name, 141–142, 144).
This guards against a common mistake: treating present suffering or apparent weakness as evidence that the kingdom is absent. In the Davidic pattern, suffering occurs precisely because the kingdom has been divinely granted but has not yet reached its public fullness. For the church under the New Covenant, this means that the opposition, persecution, and seeming weakness of the people of God do not call Christ’s present kingship into question. Rather, they belong to the pattern of the King who first suffered and then entered into his glory (Luke 24:26; Heb 2:10). Amillennial eschatology refuses both the triumphalism that expects the church’s present cultural dominance and the despair that concludes the kingdom has failed because the world remains hostile.
David Refuses to Seize the Kingdom
The most important ethical and theological feature of the narrative is David’s refusal to establish his reign by murdering Saul. In the cave, David has the opportunity to kill Saul, but he refuses to strike “the LORD’s anointed.” He leaves judgment and enthronement in the Lord’s hands. Saul himself eventually recognizes the implication: David will certainly become king, and the kingdom will be established in his hand (1 Sam 24:4–7, 16–22). The same pattern occurs again in 1 Samuel 26. David rejects Abishai’s claim that God has given Saul into his hand. God’s providential delivery of Saul does not authorize David to seize the throne. David expects God to act in God’s own time.
Leithart draws the connection directly: David does not seize the kingdom by force but entrusts himself to God, who will raise him in due time, anticipating the pattern of Jesus. The parallel should not be pressed into an exact identification of Saul with Satan. A better correspondence is simply this:
Saul is the rejected ruler who still exercises temporary authority.
David is the chosen king who suffers before public enthronement.
David refuses to take the kingdom through sinful violence.
God himself removes the old ruler and establishes the new king.
Christ likewise did not seize the kingdom by political intrigue or military force. He entrusted himself to the Father, who raised him and exalted him in due time (Phil 2:6–11; 1 Pet 2:23). From a 1689 Baptist perspective, this reinforces that the church’s advance is not through grasping after earthly power by ungodly means, but through the proclamation of the gospel, the administration of the ordinances, and the patient endurance of the saints under the already-reigning Christ (cf. 1689 Confession, chaps. 24, 26).
The Stages of David’s Enthronement
David’s public reign unfolds in stages rather than all at once. After Saul’s death, Judah anoints David king over Judah. Later, all Israel comes to Hebron and anoints him king over the whole nation (2 Sam 5:1–5). That staged development supports an amillennial distinction between:
David’s private anointing: divine appointment and identity.
David’s effective but partial rule: faithful activity while Saul remains in power.
David’s rule over Judah: a real but limited public reign.
David’s rule over all Israel: broader public recognition and consummation of the promise.
The analogy to Christ should be made at the level of theological pattern, not chronology. Acts 2 presents Jesus as raised, exalted to the Father’s right hand, and publicly constituted as Lord and Christ. Yet Hebrews says that, although everything has been subjected to him in principle, “at present we do not yet see everything in subjection to him” (Heb 2:8–9). That is almost a textual definition of the already/not-yet tension: Christ reigns now, but the visible and universal manifestation of that reign awaits the consummation.
Christ the Greater David
The David story must not be used to suggest that Christ’s present reign is merely potential, symbolic, or postponed. David’s anointing already changed his status, and the Spirit’s presence already marked him as the coming king. Likewise, Christ is already exalted and reigns now; believers have already been transferred into his kingdom (Col 1:13–14). The “not yet” concerns not the uncertainty of Christ’s kingship but the incompleteness of its public manifestation. The Davidic pattern therefore fits an amillennial structure well: the King is enthroned, the kingdom is active, the old order is being judged, opposition remains, and the final abolition of death awaits Christ’s return.
In the 1689 Baptist tradition, this coheres with a robust doctrine of the New Covenant: Christ is the Mediator who has already inaugurated the better covenant by his blood (Heb 8–10), and the church is the present expression of his kingdom people, gathered under his Word and ordinances while we wait for the resurrection and the new creation. The story of David between anointing and enthronement therefore does more than illustrate a point. It trains the church to live faithfully under an already-reigning King whose final public glory is certain, even while we still sojourn in the wilderness.
The pattern is clear: anointing, opposition, wilderness suffering, refusal to seize power, staged enthronement—and then the New Testament’s presentation of Christ as the greater David whose reign is already present but not yet consummated. In that tension the church is called to hope, endurance, and faithful witness.
Top 10 Reasons our Kids Leave Church

We all know them, the kids who were raised in church. They were stars of the youth group. They maybe even sang in the praise band or led worship. And…
Top 10 Reasons our Kids Leave Church
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Compromising our Worldview
“Most people catch their presuppositions from their family and surrounding society, the way that a child catches the measles. But people with understanding realize that their presuppositions should be *chosen* after a careful consideration of which worldview is true.”
― Francis A. Schaeffer, How Should We Then Live? The Rise and Decline of Western Thought and Culture
So where do we get our presuppositions?
11 Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them. 12 For it is shameful even to speak of the things that they do in secret. 13 But when anything is exposed by the light, it becomes visible,[1]
In 1st Chronicles 12 the mighty men of Israel under David are listed by tribes, in verse 12 we are told:
Of Issachar, men who had understanding of the times, to know what Israel ought to do, 200 chiefs, and all their kinsmen under their command.[2]
The culture that is around us is powerful, we can compromise our biblical worldview to the culture and not even realize we have. The TV and movies we watch, the music we listen to can and does affect how we look at the world around us. What do we laugh at when we watch a comedy, does God condemn what we find funny? How do we talk to others about our wives and families? Do we make jokes about our wives? Do we seek ways to avoid spending time with our children, so we can spend time on ourselves? Do we capitulate our spiritual leadership in the home and family to our wives?
I saw this posted the other day and while it was intended to be funny I personally think this is an extremely sad commentary of how men have largely capitulated their spiritual leadership and over all authority in the home and family!

This is the kind of thing we need to be watchful of, laughing at things like this sears our consciences a little at a time until we are looking at the world around us through the lens of the culture rather than through the lens of Scripture. We must always be on guard, we must look at everything we do, watch, and listen to critically. We need to understand that we are in a war. In WW2 there was a saying “Loose Lips sinks ships” why was that important? If the location and movements of military assets was to be inadvertently be given away to the enemy, then lives could potentially be lost. In the same way we must always be on guard to our surroundings what sounds good and right may not always be good and right when we look at it from the lens of scripture. Worldviews and presuppositions come at us from many different directions, unfortunately, one of common way false presuppositions come at us is through some “Contemporary Christian Music. I have many times heard a song on the radio and catch myself singing along only to stop and ask, what did I just sing, and there’s something about that that just doesn’t line up with God’s Word. And why should that surprise us, Remember for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light[1]. We must Remember Paul commended the Bereans because they were more noble than those in Thessalonica; they received the word with all eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so.[2] So I’ll leave us with this question, If they were commended for examining the Scriptures against what the Apostle Paul said, should we not examine them against what we hear and sing, and read from men today?
[1] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (2 Co 11:14). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.
[2] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Ac 17:11). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.
[1] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Eph 5:11–13). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.
[2] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (1 Ch 12:32). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.
Posted in Uncategorized
1 Comment
Thorns our Sides
Now the angel of the Lord went up from Gilgal to Bochim. And he said, “I brought you up from Egypt and brought you into the land that I swore to give to your fathers. I said, ‘I will never break my covenant with you, and you shall make no covenant with the inhabitants of this land; you shall break down their altars.’ But you have not obeyed my voice. What is this you have done? So now I say, I will not drive them out before you, but they shall become thorns in your sides, and their gods shall be a snare to you.
”The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Jdg 2:1–3). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.
I will no longer drive out before them any of the nations that Joshua left when he died, in order to test Israel by them, whether they will take care to walk in the way of the Lord as their fathers did, or not.”
”The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Jdg 2:21–22). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.
Some other passages that address this subject are
Numbers 33:55-56 and Joshua 23:13
William Gurnall in The Christian in Complete Armour said:
He doth not by this shew thee to be a hypocrite, but gives thee a fair advantage of proving thyself sincere; not much unlike his dealings with the Israelites, before whom he did not, as they expected, hastily drive out the nations, but left them as thorns in their sides, and why? hear the reason from God’s own mouth, Judges 2:22 : ‘That through them I may prove Israel, whether they will keep the way of the Lord to walk therein as their fathers did keep it, or not.’ Thus God leaves these corruptions in thee, to prove whether thou wilt at last fall in and be friends with them, or maintain the conflict with them, and continue praying against them, by which perseverance thou wilt prove thyself to be indeed upright.
Gurnall, W., & Campbell, J. (1845). The Christian in Complete Armour (p. 252). London: Thomas Tegg.
When we think about “Thorns in the Flesh” we most often think about the passage in
2 Corinthians 12:7-8 Where the Apostle Paul, speaks of his “thorn in the flesh”. Most folks tend to think that this was some type of physical affliction that affected Paul, and it may well have been. But in looking at some of these passages it’s apparent that there are times when God may give us a Spiritual “Thorn in the Flesh” and based what we read here it sometimes is a result of our own disobedience to God’s Word.
Do we ever have people in our lives, co-workers, neighbors, acquaintances, that it’s clear by their behavior, actions and, speech that they are not believers? I know I have co-workers that every other word out of their mouth is profanity. Their morals or lack thereof are obvious. Yet they and many others like them are placed in our lives. Often, we tend to think our lives would be so much easier if these kind of folks were not around us, that all the unbelievers we encountered were calm, easy going and not blaspheming every time they spoke, and receptive to the gospel, or at least not in open hostility to it? Generally, the folks we are around most of our days are a mix with some on either extreme and most somewhere in the middle.
Certainly, we are called to share the gospel with all the kinds of folks like I just described, even the most vial of these people can have moments where there is an opening to show them that they are sinners in need of a savior, and we must seize those opportunities to introduce them to Jesus.
However, if we look at the passages above, do we ever consider that it could very well be that God has allowed them to be in our lives as a test of our own unfaithfulness, just as He did when He did not remove the nations from the land of Canaan? And not just those on the extreme, but the “good guys” we are around who may not cuss like sailors, or gawk at every female that walks by, but are just as lost as those who do, can be a test for our own faithfulness. He allows people in our lives that are living in idolatry and it is our responsibility to remain faithful as we go about our lives. We must be careful how much association we have with unbelievers, while we often need to have a working relationship with them, if we begin to develop personal relationships that are not deliberate evangelistic opportunities it very easy to fall into the same idolatrous practices that consume their lives.
This was the Apostle Paul’s warning to the Corinthian church when under the influence of those who were denying the resurrection.
Do not be deceived: “Bad company ruins good morals.”
This is why the Israelites were warned by God over and over not to allow inter marriage with the pagan cultures that lived around them and why it usually led to disaster when they did it anyway.
We must find the balance between being salt and light to a lost and dying world and crossing over into idolatry ourselves by too close an association with unbelievers. We must also surround ourselves with faithful brothers who will keep us on the right path and even bring us correction if they see us start to stray, and we must have boldness to confront our brothers when we see them start down a path away from the truth of the gospel, by their interaction with unbelievers.
So, this week as we go about our daily lives when we encounter unbelievers, remember, look for those opportunities to share with them that they are sinners and that there is nothing they can do to save themselves, but that there is a savior who will save them by His grace. We must also need to see the encounter as whether we will, as the author of Judges says, “take care to walk in the way of the Lord.”
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Buying Books
Going to start off by saying I actually started writing this several weeks ago, as I was gathering my thoughts and making some notes, I started feeling bad, and when I finally got bad enough to go to the Doctor, low and behold I tested positive for The Rona! It hit me pretty hard, so I’ve been out of it for a while. Still not over it but doing a lot better.
Secondly this blog post is going to be a little different than the previous ones. For this post I’m not going to get theological and we aren’t going to dig into scripture. So, you ask, what is this going to be about then? Well I’m glad you asked!
There have been a couple of seemingly unrelated events that have me thinking about some things and as I thought through them, they may not be as unrelated as I first thought. We all have heard about how Amazon pulled the plug on Parler by knocking them off their servers, because they wouldn’t shut down certain accounts. Now I’m a great believer that private companies and individuals are perfectly within their rights to do business or not with who ever they choose (this should apply to florists and cake bakers, just as well as Amazon, but that’s a discussion for another day), but another event got me to thinking about something else.
Our pastor leads a group of men mostly from our church (though we have a few from other area churches) we meet once a month and we receive a book then the next month we discuss that book together, after reading it. Each man participating pays a predetermined amount up front that covers all the books for the year as well as a banquet we have with our wives in December. Then through the year our pastor orders the books for the whole group.
He ordered the book we are kicking off with this year, but Amazon would only allow him to order 4 books at a time. He asked me to order 4 more so we could get enough books here in time which I gladly did.
Now I didn’t have to order them from Amazon, there are other outlets I could have ordered from, but Amazon is so easy, put in what you want and 2 day later it magically shows up in my mailbox, and thanks to being a Prime member, I didn’t even have to pay for that 2 day shipping!
But as I considered this, I had to wonder, what is the price we all may one day have to pay for that ease and convenience? Amazon holds the strings that can just decide we don’t want the general public to have access to Parler. (this goes much deeper than Parler, or Amazon and applies to any platform. Haven’t ourselves and others banned from Facebook, Twitter, or fill in the blank for something they didn’t like us saying.)
Now Amazon has limited their customers from buying more than 4 of a certain book. Why 4? Why not 2 or, 1 or, none. They say it’s due to limited stock, but do they really need a reason? Couldn’t they just decide that they don’t think certain books should not be read and not sell them anymore?
So, what would we do then? Maybe we could get it from a Christian Book seller like Lifeway, or Christian Book Distributer. Or maybe we couldn’t? What if our need for ease and convenience causes these other suppliers to go out of business? Lifeway has already closed all their brick and mortar stores, what’s next?
Here is what I plan to do, when I want or need a book (according to my wife my book buying is close to an addiction) I’ll look first at the smaller publishers such as Founders Ministries, Reformation Heritage Book, or the dozens of others out there. If I can’t find it there, I’ll look at Lifeway, CBD, or some other Christian book seller. Only as a last resort will I order a Christian Book through Amazon, or Barnes and Noble and such.
Will the cost be a little higher? Will I have to pay for shipping? Will it take longer to get here? The answer to all of these is probably yes, but I personally would rather see some of these other resources stick around to have the books I want and need available than to have Amazon or some other big company decide for me what I should or should not read.
I’m not suggesting that others must do this the way I am, but I am suggesting that you should think about it!
Posted in Uncategorized
1 Comment
We Do We Teach Our Young Ones?
When talking about education, for a lot of people, it simply means getting equipped with the knowledge to join the work force and to survive as adults.
Education should go far beyond that. Living in today’s world where beauty has been perverted and the truth about sex, gender roles, faith, work and life has been distorted requires reviving an education that equips the youth to stand where God stands no matter the pressure to fit in from culture.

Because children are not adequately equipped to apply the knowledge they get from school with wisdom, enlightenment seem to be inversely proportional to sanity. Each generation have something better to say about the past, at least for those who still treasure sanity, decorum and moral values.
How can we educate our children to get balanced knowledge that they may know how to apply wisdom in the practical world, so that our culture…
View original post 102 more words
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Multiplying Altars for Sinning
Hosea 8:11-12 (NASB)
Since Ephraim has multiplied altars for sin, They have become altars of sinning for him.
Though I wrote for him ten thousand precepts of My law, They are regarded as a strange thing.
We all know the history of Hosea. How God Commanded him to marry a harlot as a judgement against Israel. Just as Hosea’s wife left him repeatedly for other men so Israel repeatedly left their God for false gods. Hosea’s prophesies were primarily directed at the 10 northern tribes (a few were directed at Judah). After Solomon the 10 northern tribes rebelled and broke ties with Judah, they were frequently at war with one another. Time after time Israel would turn their back on God and chance after idols. Now in Hosea’s day they were on the verge of being taken captive by Assyria, which would essentially remove all remaining association with the other tribes of Judah and Benjamin.
These verses in chapter 8 where we started talk about the alters that they set up for the worship of their false gods. God had placed His alter in Jerusalem, but they chose for themselves a different way to worship. It says they Multiplied altars for sinning. The designed intent of the altars was to worship in their own way and in doing so they committed sin against the creator of the universe. They sought to create a unique way of worship something new and different they came up with a better way to do it than the way God showed them.
Looking at verse 12 the first thing we need to look at is “Though I wrote” It’s important to remember who the author of God’s Word is, actually God. Too often I think we forget that not Hosea in this case, or Moses, or Paul Or John, but God himself is the author. He gave us His Word, it is a gift from God, do we view it as a gift or do we view it simply as rules to live by, or even worse just suggestions? Do we spend time in His Word every day? When we do spend time in His Word do we look at how it applies in our lives? Three things we need to do when looking at God’s Word 1. What does it say? 2. What does it mean? 3. What shall I do?
Deuteronomy 4:5-8 (NASB)
“See, I have taught you statutes and judgments just as the LORD my God commanded me, that you should do thus in the land where you are entering to possess it. “So keep and do them, for that is your wisdom and your understanding in the sight of the peoples who will hear all these statutes and say, ‘Surely this great nation is a wise and understanding people.’ “For what great nation is there that has a god so near to it as is the LORD our God whenever we call on Him? “Or what great nation is there that has statutes and judgments as righteous as this whole law which I am setting before you today?
The second thing we need to look at is the precepts of God’s Law These are God’s laws, Spurgeon said of this verse “there is nothing in this bible that is unimportant” Ephraim had been give the law of God, yet it was foreign to them it wasn’t a part of their lives. If you’ve been at First Family, this month we’ve been talking about Worldview. Even though they had God’s law it was regarded as a strange thing.
As we look at the culture around us today, would you say that there are many who set up “altars for sinning”? Even many who claim to be Christian but have come up with a “better way” or “some new thing” but they are simply doing their own thing their own way, not God’s way. We can’t just do something because we think feels right to us, Paul told Timothy, 1 Timothy 3:14-15 (ESV) I hope to come to you soon, but I am writing these things to you so that, if I delay, you may know how one ought to behave in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, a pillar and buttress of the truth. The people of Ephraim ignored this and many in our day are as well. The laws of God sounded “strange to them” Many today when faced with the truth of the Word will tell us that the teachings are “strange”
Al Mohler in an article on Biblical discernment wrote;
It is hard not to conclude that theological discernment is now a lost art among American evangelicals — and this loss can only lead to theological catastrophe.
The tragedy that evangelicals have lost the art of biblical discernment must be traced to a disastrous loss of biblical knowledge. Discernment cannot survive without doctrine.
Spurgeon said “Discernment is not knowing the difference between right and wrong, it’s knowing the difference between right and almost right”
With this loss of theological discernment and biblical knowledge is it any wonder that the teaching of the laws of God, even among professing Christians would sound strange?
What do we then need to do? First, we need to be in God’s Word daily, we must learn from one another, we must meet together regularly with believers who are sound in the Word. I’ve often said there is no one person smarter than we all are together. We must speak lovingly and compassionately, but firmly against those who seek to pervert God’s Word for their own purposes, we must diligently teach the truth to those we have influence over whether our families, our SS Class or other study groups, and lastly we must share the truth of the gospel with unbelievers, it must be the true gospel not a watered down gospel, or feel good gospel, but the true gospel the good news, and the bad news.
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Amazing Grace
Amazing Grace, How sweet the sound That saved a wretch like me I once was lost, but now am found T’was blind but now I see
Most of us have probably sung this song many times, but how often do we just repeat the words without thinking about what the words really mean. So let’s take a few minutes to look at them a little closer.
Amazing Grace, How sweet the sound, hold on to that and we’ll come back to this line
That saved a wretch like me, what is a wretch? We don’t use that word very often today, so some may not truly understand what it means. The Dictionary says it’s “a person of despicable or base character.” Many will say well that’s not me, I’m not a despicable person! Who do you think of when you think about a despicable person? Adolf Hitler? Usama Bin Laden? Or the Kid who shot up the school a couple weeks ago? But whose standard are we using to decide if someone is despicable or not? Our own standard? The standard of our culture? Hasn’t the standard of what is considered despicable changed in our culture over the years? There are many things that are accepted today that would have been considered despicable just a few years ago.
The Apostle John tells the Church in Laodicea in the Book of Revelation. “‘I know your works: you are neither cold nor hot. Would that you were either cold or hot! So, because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of my mouth. For you say, I am rich, I have prospered, and I need nothing, not realizing that you are WRETCHED, pitiable, poor, blind, and naked.” Revelation 3:15-17 (ESV)
So someone can be a wretch, and not know it, as a matter of fact there are many, many people in our culture how don’t realize they are wretches. All because they are looking at the wrong standard for what it means to be a despicable wretch. So where do we find the right standard? We find it in the one who made the standard, the one who made us! God’s Word says in Romans 3:9-18 (ESV)
For we have already charged that all, both Jews and Greeks, are under sin, 10 as it is written: “None is righteous, no, not one; 11 no one understands; no one seeks for God. 12 All have turned aside; together they have become worthless; no one does good, not even one.” 13 “Their throat is an open grave; they use their tongues to deceive.” “The venom of asps is under their lips.” 14 “Their mouth is full of curses and bitterness.” 15 “Their feet are swift to shed blood; 16 in their paths are ruin and misery, 17 and the way of peace they have not known.” 18 “There is no fear of God before their eyes.”
So by God’s Standard who is a Despicable Wretch? I am, others are! Everyone reading this is, everyone you encounter today is.
Think about this when you sing, that Amazing Grace saved a “Wretch like me”
I once was lost, but now am found T’was blind but now I see
Before Grace, we are all Lost and Blind. Think about someone who is lost in the woods. They are wandering around, not knowing where they are going, sometimes just walking in circles. What if he finds a map and a compass is he any better off? Maybe if he knows how to read the map and use the compass!
Now think about someone who is blind, Kids sometimes play a game where they are blindfolded and they have to try to attach a tail in the right place on the picture of a donkey. It’s fun to watch them and most of the time the tail ends up some place other than where it belongs.
A person who hasn’t received God’s Amazing Grace is like that, they are wandering around in circles in life not knowing where they are going. Sometimes they may even have God’s map “The Bible” but if they try to use it as a kind of a “self-help” book they it doesn’t do them much good, they are not using properly. They try to put the pieces of their life together, but they are blind and keep putting them in the wrong places.
But Now I’m found, and Now I see, what caused this transformation? The Amazing Grace of God. Through the work of Jesus Christ and the power of The Holy Spirit you are to realize that you are lost, and that you are blind but now you can clearly see that you are a Despicable Wretch and that only God’s amazing grace can save, a Despicable Wretch like me, then someone can fully understand just how sweet the sound of Amazing Grace, really is.
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Evangelical Discernment
Last year during my daily reading I read this passage in 1 Kings 13, and I have been chewing on it ever since. I have to do a devotion at a meeting next week so I pulled this passage back out and started making some notes. Then a few days later a friend posted an article from Albert Mohler about a book that was released a few years ago and it was a confirmation that this this was what I needed to speak on. Read it here http://www.albertmohler.com/2010/01/27/the-shack-the-missing-art-of-evangelical-discernment/ . This book was made into a movie and is about to be released next month, hence the timing of posting an article written 7 years ago. The popularity of this book and others like it among evangelicals is disturbing and indicates a severe lack of comprehension of God’s Word and What His Word teaches. It seems many professing Christians don’t have even a basic understanding of the Gospel.
I skip through several verses but I encourage you to go and read the entire passage.
1 Kings 13:1-34 (ESV) 1 And behold, a man of God came out of Judah by the word of the LORD to Bethel. Jeroboam was standing by the altar to make offerings. 7 And the king said to the man of God, “Come home with me, and refresh yourself, and I will give you a reward.” 8 And the man of God said to the king, “If you give me half your house, I will not go in with you. And I will not eat bread or drink water in this place, 9 for so was it commanded me by the word of the LORD, saying, ‘You shall neither eat bread nor drink water nor return by the way that you came.’ ” 10 So he went another way and did not return by the way that he came to Bethel. 11 Now an old prophet lived in Bethel. And his sons came and told him all that the man of God had done that day in Bethel. They also told to their father the words that he had spoken to the king. 12 And their father said to them, “Which way did he go?” And his sons showed him the way that the man of God who came from Judah had gone. 13 And he said to his sons, “Saddle the donkey for me.” So they saddled the donkey for him and he mounted it. 14 And he went after the man of God and found him sitting under an oak. And he said to him, “Are you the man of God who came from Judah?” And he said, “I am.” 15 Then he said to him, “Come home with me and eat bread.” 16 And he said, “I may not return with you, or go in with you, neither will I eat bread nor drink water with you in this place, 17 for it was said to me by the word of the LORD, ‘You shall neither eat bread nor drink water there, nor return by the way that you came.’ ” 18 And he said to him, “I also am a prophet as you are, and an angel spoke to me by the word of the LORD, saying, ‘Bring him back with you into your house that he may eat bread and drink water.’ ” But he lied to him. 23 And after he had eaten bread and drunk, he saddled the donkey for the prophet whom he had brought back. 24 And as he went away a lion met him on the road and killed him. And his body was thrown in the road, and the donkey stood beside it; the lion also stood beside the body.
Reminds me of 1 Peter 5:8. Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour. In our culture we are surrounded by people that claim to know the way of God, but many, or probably most are not speaking from the true source of God’s Word. They are speaking from their own thoughts, their own ideas of how things ought to be, using proof texts to make their point sound as though it’s God’s Word. That’s what this prophet did! Vs. 18 “I also am a prophet as you are, and an angel spoke to me by the word of the LORD” “But he lied to him”
We see this happening in books and movies like the Shack, but every “Christian” book we read or movie we watch, every sermon we hear, every radio program, every podcast, every song we hear, every conversation we have with professing believers must be held up to the light of God’s Word and where what we hear isn’t consistent with His Word must be rejected.
Keeping in mind that we can be wrong, that we can have a misunderstanding of the Word, we need to stay first of all in Scripture and prayer, we also need to be in constant and close fellowship with others who are in the Word regularly (it’s what we call the church). This serves to keep us lined up with scripture, and to correct our brothers and sisters in Christ from falling away as well.
Al Mohler says in his article about the Shack “All this reveals a disastrous failure of evangelical discernment. It is hard not to conclude that theological discernment is now a lost art among American evangelicals — and this loss can only lead to theological catastrophe.”
So what this prophet experienced in listening to someone who was promoting his own agenda we can too if we aren’t careful to listen closely to God’s Word. But this has been going on for a long time, Genesis 3:1 (ESV) Now the serpent was more crafty than any other beast of the field that the LORD God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God actually say, ‘You shall not eat of any tree in the garden’?” Satan has been twisting God’s Word from the Beginning, and he continues to do it today many times through people who call themselves evangelical Christians.
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
A Professional Cluture
We have become a culture of professionals. When we need our tax returns filled out we gather up all our receipts and take them to a tax professional, when we don’t feel good we go to a medical professional, if we need a plumber, and electrician, or a roofer we hire a professional, when we need the oil changed in our cars, we take it to a professional. I got my first car in 1973 and from then until 2003 nobody ever changed the oil in one of my vehicles except me, but something happened in 2003. I bought a new car, and as I was doing the paperwork, the salesman brought me a laminated card, and said bring this back with you every 3000 mile and we’ll change your oil for free for as long as you own this car, ever since, most of the time I take my car or truck and have the oil changed. It was just easier even when I got rid of that car and had to pay for it myself, maybe I just got lazy? Sometimes we may use a professional but we still need to have a good idea of what is going on, suppose our tax preparer makes a mistake on our tax returns? Who is the IRS go to be coming to see? I had something like this happen to me about 8 years ago, my accountant gave me some tax advice and I trusted him, but when I had him do my taxes for that year, I ended up owing $10,000 when we asked him about it he just said he was sorry but that happens sometimes, he had been charging $200 to do my taxes in previous years, but this year he charged me $350. Needless to say he didn’t do my taxes again. But I got over that, yeah it cost me some money, I was mad at the guy for a while, but I survived and I got over it.
Unfortunately I believe that too often we bring this culture of professionals in to the church.
Deuteronomy 6:4-9 (ESV) “Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one. You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might. And these words that I command you today shall be on your heart. You shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, and when you walk by the way, and when you lie down, and when you rise. You shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes. You shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates.
In 2009 by Ken Ham wrote the book Already Gone he reveals some very disturbing statistics. Research by George Barna a well-known Christian Pollster found young adults who were active members of conservative evangelical churches in America during their childhood and youth years (These are the kids in our Sunday school classes, youth groups, and here with their parents every Sunday) that 61% of these kids will completely leave the church by the end of their freshman year of college.
Why does this happen? Ken Ham and others say that it is because these kids don’t see the things they learn in their church and youth group lived out at home. They are not a priority in the lives of their parents, it’s not a priority in the lives of their friends and extended family. They see their parents making a priority out of being successful in their career, to have a bigger house or a nicer car, they see them making golf, or fishing or hunting a priority in their lives. Kids are being driven to get a good education, to excel in sports, but if parents don’t take time to make the reading and study of God’s Word a priority then why would we expect our kids to make church a priority when they are not being “made to go”. Voddie Baucham, in his book, “Family Driven Faith” says “If I teach my son to keep his eye on the ball but fail to teach him to keep his eyes on Christ, I have failed as a father”
I know the impact that a father can have on a young person’s attitude about the church, and about God’s Word. I grew up in a church going home, but we were what I referred to as Sunday Christians. We were in church most every Sunday morning, but the other 6 ½ days a week you couldn’t tell us apart from the rest of the pagans in the neighborhood. I distinctly remember one Sunday Morning, that I think was a turning point for me. My Step-Dad was a musician, and was in a band he played saxophone and sang, now this was the early 70s and he was playing Bing Crosby, and Perry Como, and I was listening to Led Zeppelin and the Allman Brothers so there was very little common ground musically. But the Saturday night before this Sunday I remember he had played with his band at the Elks Club (or Moose or something like that) and apparently they must have been doing pretty good because somebody kept buying the band rounds of drinks and he got pretty drunk, so drunk that he came home and crawled straight in to bed. But Sunday morning and he woke up late and he started cussing out the alarm clock, because it didn’t get him up, of course he hadn’t set it the night before, but he was really upset because this was going to cause us to be late for church, and he had to get to the choir because he was supposed to sing a solo that morning. But my 14 year old mind saw it for what it was, but my 14 year old mind also said “what’s the point of all this church stuff. Why does everybody pretend to be someone different on Sunday morning from what they are the rest of the week. It was then that I waked away from the church, and was years later before ever came back to it.
I saw the hypocrisy in my step-dad and our kids will see hypocrisy in us, because every one of us in this room has been a hypocrite in the past, is a hypocrite now, or will be a hypocrite in the future. The important thing is how they see that we deal with it, either in a spirit of repentance, or a spirit of denial.
So what does it mean to Teach God’s commands “diligently to our children”? John Bunyan the author of Pilgrims Progress in an essay entitled Christian Family speaking of fathers says;
“First, concerning the spiritual state of his family; he ought to be very diligent and cautious, doing his utmost both to increase faith where it is begun, and to begin it where it is not. Therefore, he must diligently and frequently bring before his family the things of God, from His Holy Word, in accordance with what is suitable for each person. And let no man question his authority from the Word of God for such a practice.
So what are some things we can do? The most important thing you can do is start. Start by reading God’s Word out loud to your family. There are numerous Devotional books based on scripture for all age groups that can help you get started. Allow your children to ask biblical questions. This helps in a couple of ways, you may have to dig in to God’s Word yourself to find their answers, which is a good thing, and it also stirs their hearts toward God, and they see that it is important enough for you to answer. I if you really get stumped, then ask somebody yourself, but at all possible avoid the “That’s just the way it is” answers. Some other things you can do is let your family see you reading and studying Scripture, let them see you pray, pray with them, pray with your wife, study the Word with your wife. Now I know the big question is “Where am I going to find time to do all this”? Well we must make it a priority, maybe start with turning off the TV, Learning about the exodus has more value than learning who gets voted off the island, and What the apostle Paul has to say is much more important than what Bill O’Reilly has to say. It all comes down to what we consider a priority.
Now keep in mind I am not suggesting that we need to run off all the youth pastors, and shut down the children’s programs. They exist to help families and reinforce what we are teaching our children at home. We can’t expect our youth and children leadership in the church to be able to teach in a few hours a week everything our families need to overcome the bombardment that we all face the rest of the time. But don’t rely on professionals to exclusively to teach your family God’s Word.
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment